Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Other Brands' started by jpac, May 7, 2014.
Still got my fingers crossed they fit like the 4.0s or I'll have to sell them.
if anyone wants to pay that svd tax
So you’re paying an extra $40 for a shoe just cause it’s from undefeated ....I don’t get it.
Maybe I’m missing something
- Those are 4.0 upper; black UNDFTDs are 1.0 upper
- Leather tongues
- Collaboration with a highly recognized brand = hype
I actually agree with you, I think it was honestly a lazy cw. But it’s Unfftd and people are thirsty for the 1.0 upper, so they can get with that, I suppose.
Different knit, different outsole, different heel, different tongue, extra laces, added taping, not a GR.
Hey I got mine yesterday from Livestock, I got my TTS (Size 9) and they fit perfect. They are not as loose as the 3.0 and a bit snugger than the 4.0.
I does not
There's also surely much better photos out there showing the knit of those from above
Well, it's more like extra $40 for 1.0 knit, white outsole, different tongue, collab branding, atr strip at toebox, and different color stabilizer plate or w/e that thing is called.
But I do agree that it's a pretty lazy collab.
Saw a review somewhere that said it was just a 4.0 knit with the stripes removed. Think he was referring to the pattern of holes on the toe box that he said more resembled the 4.0 pattern rather than 1.0 pattern. All I know is that I'm pretty happy I hit on a raffle for these and the more pictures I see the more excited I am to get them in hand.
Whoever said that was wrong.
Black = 1.0
White = 4.0
Damn. I'm a wide footer. Also, for some reason the 3.0s I have fit differently. My CNYs fit TTS (though slightly snug) at a size 9 and my Trace Cargos fit tight at size 9 so I traded for a 9.5 which is much better. I think I'll be selling them, but might put them on feet before I make any decisions, but leaning towards just trying to trade for a 9.5. LS Toronto? I have no faith getting a W there so it's good to see someone scoring.
Good to know. It was a pretty b grade review.
Wouldn’t that be ideal though? The 1.0 knit was pretty thin but had a better pattern. Seems like combining the looks of the 1.0 with the feel of the 4.0 would be the best option.
Nah the thicker pk is part of the problem with current UB shape. Only benefit of the more recent knits is in the heel/midfoot area where they have replaced the mesh/foam with more pk.
The thinner the better imo
Toe box talk
black also sold out first in SF
Boiii, if u are still debating if it is worth grabbing the undftd ub, stockx/goat are the only places to get ‘em now.
**** I keep missing these links
the reason why people are still confused/debating if the blacks are 1.0 because there are samples floating around with the black pair in 4.0 knit.
that and it really doesn't make much sense given the landscape right now. They haven't put 1.0 retros out yet...we are on 4.0s right now..the whites are 4.0s...like why are the blacks 1.0. Just doesn't make common sense right now
I thought I was going crazy with the 3.0 fit as well! Of my 3.0s, core blacks and trace cargos both fit snug but my triple whites fit TTS, if not a little loose. I only have one pair of 4.0s (white/white/blacks) but they fit perfectly TTS.
After the undefeated L and letting go of core black 1.0 and Oreo 4.0 I'm gonna go for one of my Grails the sns x ss ultra boost. I have the lux, can anyone who has both tell me if the fit is different? Are the sns tighter? Should I stay TTS like I did for the lux (which fit perfect) or could I go down half a size and get away with removing the insole?
Anyone going to remove the cage on them undefeateds?