Nike REACT ....INSTANT GO

42,567
41,473
Joined Oct 10, 2013
The change in upper for the ir2 was needed. Ir1 upper was beyond minimal and offered near zero containment and lockdown. If your foot didn’t fit the shoe perfectly you were in trouble. As for looks, the ir2 looks way worse than the 1’s. These 3’s look like crap in those pictures
 
104
128
Joined Apr 15, 2019
I didn't like the IR1 because the upper didn't look like flyknit at all, plus it had the foil-looking fuse wrapping the swoosh and heel that made the whole thing look plastic-y. I like how the toe-rand/overlay portions of the IR2 give the shoe a layered look with that signature flyknit design even though the inner "panels" were still that plastic-feeling flyknit.
 
3,460
2,922
Joined Dec 1, 2013
The change in upper for the ir2 was needed. Ir1 upper was beyond minimal and offered near zero containment and lockdown. If your foot didn’t fit the shoe perfectly you were in trouble. As for looks, the ir2 looks way worse than the 1’s. These 3’s look like crap in those pictures
To each his own but IRF2 is the better looking of the bunch easily…
 
17,477
24,457
Joined Dec 18, 2015
Top Bottom
  AdBlock Detected

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks some useful and important features of our website. For the best possible site experience please take a moment to disable your AdBlocker or head over to our upgrade page to donate for an ad-free experience Upgrade now