Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Jordan Brand' started by Spectacular23, Sep 26, 2012.
very well indeed, get a pair! Blacks pants are my go to whenever I throw on my 1's.
Wow, what a waste to use those materials on a Jumpman-branded 1. I personally can’t bring myself to wear a Jumpman branded AJ 1 so I honestly wouldn’t even consider buying those.. I’m sure I’m not the only person who feels that way.
Wear what you like.
The away version's insole had the shattered backboard print on it, just as the home/original version's. And both pairs have literally the same inspiration - the uniform worn in the exhibition game. Original shattered backboards were black toe colorblocking, away version was Chicago colorblocking. Unless there was some magical inspiration behind the orange toe on the originals that I don't know about.
Dude the materials on the sbb is not the best material jordan has ever released on any retro. If you feel that way I really feel sorry for you because Jordan has you brainwashed, especially for an adidas representative.
serious question: why do sbb have glitter if the materials they used were “2nd to none?”
SBB 2.0 suck
Only people who hype em are the ones who don’t have the originals SBB
Some better retros include 1994 Chicagos and black/red, 01 Japan releases. Again I want to make the argument that if you're paying $160 for a Jordan 1 from '15-'17 you're getting the same tier, same quality of materials. If you were really getting anything better, you'd be hit with premium prices like with pinnacles. Softer, more tumbled looking, that doesn't equal good quality.
that's cool. for me it's a dope shoe + i'm black. it's bigger than jumpman.
Or people who do not like the color-blocking on the SBB
Yeah, it had to do with the uniform colors jordan wore when shattering the glass. The away version (to me) smacked of money grab by JB. And the leather on those was made to look like the sbb leather but wasn’t close.
8, 8.5, 9, 10, 14
Even though the Original SBB just added orange, it feels more like it’s its own shoe than the 2.0 which look exactly like orange Chicago 1s
Partially, but people also forget that SBBs were Snkrs raffle only hence the scarcity.
I've been looking forward to the Wheat 1s from the jump, so it's good to finally see them in motion. These are pretty dope IMO.
Wheats look better than I expected. I'm in for a pair, great fall shoe.
color-blocking is waaaay better on the 2.0s
don't know why people get so wet over the "quality" of the made-in-china leather on the 1.0s or any other nike, though
y'all get into arguments over which mcdonald's burger is the best too?
Did they ever make Satin Chicago 1s???? I never seen any. Seller on ebay said these are samples.... Can't lie they do look dope... Shruggs... $300
That tongue tag looks all kinds of wrong on those satins.
The others didn't look like that right?
$300 for sample satin Chicago’s that never released?
2.0 is better, and I have both. Unpopular opinion, but just my thoughts.
I only have 1s and don’t want 2s
no they weren't.
2.0 definitely better