- Joined Jul 15, 2018
On day 2 of the Stone trial, the prosecutors have now seized on Stone digging himself deeper. Stone testified that he only communicated with his intermediary over the phone. He also falsely testified that Randy Credico was his intermediary and threatened to kill Credico's dog if he didn't perjure himself by matching his testimony to Stone's false testimony.What is wrong with these morons? His own attorneys are now trying to argue that Stone did not have an intermediary. In that hypothetical, that means he lied to Congress about the intermediary.
Stone's witness tampering charge is about pressuring Credico to lie under oath about him being Stone's intermediary rather than Jerome Corsi. Stone then threatened to kill Credico's dog if he didn't perjure himself to match with Stone's own testimony.
Flynn's attorneys are trying to pull a similar stunt by arguing that Flynn was actually innocent, which would mean he lied under oath twice by reaffirming every part of his guilty plea, including infront of the judge set to sentence him.
Obviously Stone is counting on a pardon but it doesn't make this strategy any less baffling.
Greatness is not something you're born with, greatness is something that is earned in the early mornings and late nights in the gym working with your trainer. The fighter in the suit jacket has clearly spent hours in the gym perfecting his craft. I could spend hours breaking down the chopping left he used but the key punch was the right hand that the fighter in the green blocked. The fighter in the suit used that punch to get the fighter in green in range to unload the left. His use of verbal quickness to open up the fighter in green for the devastating left was BEAUTIFUL. Props to Telemundo for bringing us this fight. Some of the best TV is on Telemundo. If they start to bring us fights, I will cut the cord for sure.
How is this funny, exactly? Do you know the context of this exchange? Do you know the broader context of the enmity between Greenwald and Nunes in relation to Brazilian politics?
Jesus ****ing Christ dude I am just laughing at two old washed white dudes having scrap. I know the their backgrounds.How is this funny, exactly? Do you know the context of this exchange? Do you know the broader context of the enmity between Greenwald and Nunes in relation to Brazilian politics?
I'm not trying to start an argument here, but I'm baffled by your response.
EDIT: I don't agree with Greenwald's analysis and conclusions regarding the Mueller Report and the broader issue of Russian interference, which is clearly what you were getting at. But this scenario has nothing to do with that, and Greenwald has worked tirelessly and literally put his life on the line to expose corruption at the highest levels of Brazilian society, particularly with respect to the forces that conspired to subvert democracy to frame and oust Lula and Rousseff, undermine the Workers' Party and install the current reactionary regime of Bolsoñaro. That is the basis for his animosity toward Nunes, a conservative lackey and someone who has also taken personal swipes at Greenwald's family.
But then their complaints about “censorship“ of the right would have credence (maybe not to logical people but this is how it will be spun)It’s like....we haven’t learnt a got damn thing. The View...giving Don Jr a platform to normalize this BS and spread disinformation is stupid on stupid.
I hear but at the end of the day.......who gives a DAMB what they think. If they want to be stuck on stupid and what to unknowingly complain or come up any and every excuse they want to let them. The hell with them.But then their complaints about “censorship“ of the right would have credence (maybe not to logical people but this is how it will be spun)
damb if you do, damb if you don’t