I believe Melania Trump was an undocumented immigrant who had a anchor baby with Trump.The "Michael" Obama ppl crack me up. The woman has a whole *** book detailing her childhood until today. Dates, addresses, pictures, quotes.... but a photoshop on the internet is what they CHOOSE to believe
Further proof, if proof were needed, that you can’t simultaneously support the appointment of “conservative judges” and oppose racist voter suppression.An Appeals Court sided with Republicans so the voter suppression tactic of having o ly drop off location per county remains. Here is the kicker...
So voter suppression goes forward because of seats Mitch stole from Obama.
The user made an unflattering characterization of your behavior, which you're choosing to interpret as literally as possible to suit your defense. Are you aware of any readers who seriously interpreted his use of the word "steal" as anything other than figurative? When factoring in his prior objections to your behavior, it's clear that he isn't accusing you of committing an Oceans Eleven style heist to infiltrate and abscond with $1,000 from the US Treasury.Yes, it would entirely change the tenor of his post if he used the word allegedly.
Instead he made a sweeping proclamation that I committed a crime based on information you concede that he doesn't have.
The defense of "semantics" to handwave outright lies is astounding. He stated I "stole PPP funds;" I didn't. I received a grant for my eligible business.
At best, you are saying "it is not unfair to gather your business was ineligible for the grant." But that is not the same thing, and you know it.
It would not be unfair to gather that anyone that received an EIDL grant had an ineligible business, based on your logic, with the same limited knowledge.
Now you're trying to claim that you never received "any loan at all," and anyone who states otherwise - as you yourself did in July - is telling "outright lies."I got an advance for a loan that does not need to be repaid.
For someone whose go-to move is presenting distinctions without a difference, you went full opposite lock with this swerve.It would not be unfair to gather that anyone that received an EIDL grant had an ineligible business, based on your logic, with the same limited knowledge.
He has already been asked for some of this information and could have cleared this up but chose not to.You could clear a lot of this up yourself by differentiating your Stock X account from those with which our community members are broadly (and, in many cases, personally) familiar.
How many items do you sell per year? Do you purchase more sneakers for yourself than you do for your business? What percentage of your “inventory” is in your own shoe size? Do you pay the self-employment tax? Do you file a Schedule C to report your profits? Do you file a personal property return in your state? Have you done so in years prior to your EIDL application, or are you only now treating it as a business?
So after publicly critiquing me, I am supposed to go to your inbox when no such request is made of the person who brought the entire matter up?If you have any further concerns about this, feel free to take it to my inbox. This thread has enough sources of distraction as it is, and it's clear that you strongly dislike further public discussion of your EIDL advance.
Technically you brought it up. I wouldn't have known that you stole the money without you offering up the details.So, let me get this straight, someone accuses me of committing a crime and I’m to prove myself innocent by submitting myself to questioning from fake internet tax auditors?
Or else the assertion that I “figuratively stole” is reasonable.
Gotta love the guilty until proven innocent standard
I didn’t report junglejim ’s post by the way. He offered “criticism” and I responded to the nonsense. So in the same way he can critique meI can critique his critique.
So after publicly critiquing me, I am supposed to go to your inbox when no such request is made of the person who brought the entire matter up?
I didn’t report his post. I didn’t request anything from the mods. You asked me about the preference of the “allegedly” language and I responded.
This feels like you’re using a bully pulpit to publicly condemn me and then telling me I need to respond to your public condemnation in private.
Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks some useful and important features of our website. For the best possible site experience please take a moment to disable your AdBlocker or head over to our upgrade page to donate for an ad-free experience Upgrade now